French RepublicThisis a vocabulary that corresponds to the political or campaign speeches, but has lost all meaning.FreedomThe definition according to Larousse is: Condition of a people that is governed in full sovereignty.What remains of this sovereignty, while the people themselves manifest to prove his suffering, frustration, dissatisfaction, and counting his weariness to his Government and that it feigned to hear and continued his abuse.
ÉqualityNo discrimination between human beings, in terms of their rights. Political, civil and social equality.A state in which the law is applied according to the social status of the Citizen, in which the judiciary violates the principles of law and its application, in which the poorest citizens become instruments leaders to loot public money, this state whose privileges are restricted to the ruling class, is against democracy. It is an oligarchy or in more serious cases a dictatorship.FraternityBond of solidarity that should unite all members of the human family. A link between persons who participate in the same ideal.Fraternity in a Oligarchy as became France, does not exist ! When the power (left and right confused) sacrifices middle and poor classes, to allow relatives of the Government and the captains of the economy who finance their elections, to access without sharing any privileges and any income in the economy, to selfishly enrich themselves at the expense of purchasing power of the people, such a power (Government and Parliament) must be put out of harm’s way.ReflectionsThe French Constitution of 4 October 1958 decreed its commitment to the principles of human rights and the principles of national sovereignty. The desire to have new institutions founded on the common ideal of liberty, equality and fraternity, designed for their democratic evolution.What citizen living in France who are not part of the oligarchy in place or which is not part of the privileged class, can make the connection between the living context in which he is living because of the actions of his government and rights guaranteed to citizens by the Constitution ?Leaders of states as seen more in the tab "state without law" have no more any ethics, no morals, no respect for the citizen. Their speeches are lies and deceptions. When Leaders of states are able to divert citizen profits, royalties of patents for which they are responsible, when they are able to violate the right to intellectual property protection, for their own profit, those members of governments must be brought to Justice !When this "justice" endorses and participates in the crime denounced, then there is machination and in the case of royalties FERRAYE, we must say that it is an organized gang fraud.The hearing of November 19, 2002by Mr. Eric DE LA HAYE--ST-HILAIRE, parisian Notary serving the French Government, is indicative of the absence of the rule of law in France. He refers to LE MAZOU, lawyer specialized in the field of intellectual property. He notes on page 2, he refused to orchestrate acts in France, because of the involvement of the French Petroleum Institute, “possible” responsible of embezzlement of royalties whose Joseph FERRAYE was the victim. It is the reason that Mr. DE LA HAYE--ST-HILAIRE had solicited the collaboration of Pierre MOTTU, Notary in Geneva. Parisian notary further confirms the existence of accounts referenced to "other" protagonists of this case and that a criminal Procédure was opened in France against former partners of Joseph FERRAYE.Where it gets interesting is that Mr. DE LA HAYE--ST-HILAIRE and Me LE MAZOU reflected in a legal elaborate scheme, namely a act of cession of rights contentiousof Mr. FERRAYE to a third entity called Wildrose (WR ) which had the function to liaise with the former partners of Mr. FERRAYE to find a compromise. In this scheme the patent holder would receive a percentage of the amounts recovered by WR and in return the legal proceedings engaged by complaint of Joseph FERREYE in the south of France had to be classified.Finally, in a second phase, this time in the absence of Mr. FERRAYE, Mr. Eric DE LA HAYE-ST-HILAIRE confirms that he and Pierre MOTTU had accounts statements they had submitted to the partners and agents of Joseph FERRAYE who had defrauded the royalties. ST-HILAIRE said that during the transactions, the amounts (it was tens of billions of dollars) remained frozen in accounts "whether by MOTTU or whether by lawyer BRUPPACHER in Zurich correspondent of LE MAZOU”.To finish with Me Eric DE LA HAYE-ST-HILAIRE, you should know that at the hearing of June 25, 2007 (Trial MOTTU <> BURDET for slander), Mr. ST-HILAIRE testified that he had seen copies of statements of accounts of 100 billion dollars royalties from KUWAIT. (These 100 billion did not involve the sale of systems at the French Trade Week of November 23 to 29, 1991 in Kuwait City.Denatured StatesThe aforementioned hearing of notar Eric DE LA HAYE--ST-HILAIRE shows us both that the royalties had indeed been sequestered and they were on the accounts of Notary Pierre MOTTU and lawyer Mark C. BRUPPACHER in Zurich. associate of LE MAZOU. The hearing also shows us that the French "justice" had good control on the partners and agents of Joseph FERRAYE who had defrauded the royalties, since proceedings were open in the south of France.So how in a State of the law, can we set up a "elaborated scheme" to "to dispose of rights contentious" for those who had defrauded a citizen ? Does not the law foresee that the author of a fraud must be condemned and the booty recovered shall be returned to its owner ?This shows us clearly and with certainty, that if Mr. Eric DE LA HAYE-ST-HILAIRE was Notary of the French Government, He wanted to find a "more elaborate scheme" to subtract the CROOKS in prosecution knowing that the political environment was watered copiously in this scam. Daniel LEVAVASSEUR member of the RPR and former agent of the DST who had found accounts on which royalties were transfered, had told Joseph FERRAYE that his intention was to resolve the problem without the politicians are affected. You should know that after the sale of systems to all oil producing countries, the royalties were calculated in trillions of dollars (at the time).Place to the VIe RépublicOn October 18, 2006, Joseph FERRAYE filed a criminal complaint with the Tribunal de Grande Instance of Nanterre, complaint registered under number N 06 291 0047 with stamp of prosecutor of the Republic... Nearly 10 years after the filing of the complaint which included a memory of 200 pagesand 177 evidence of the crimes committed, no action has ever been given. The responsibility of France in this procedure, is calculated in tens of billions of Euros!Confidence in the French political authorities can never be restored. The proof is given that the French authorities - Left and Right together - are able to defraud and appropriating the property of others, on which they have no right, to their personal interests. One must then ask the question of what they will do with the retirement assets they control, with contributions to the health, with saving money on bank accounts, usw., knowing that the banks were financial instruments that allowed this fraud, cautioned by the State. It is the banks that manage these huge capitals that allowed holders who have cheated, to take control of the economy.No Law in the current legislation does refer to fraud or crimes made by the Magistrates or other holders of the Judiciary and how they would be condamned. That is maybe why they can continue their crimes with total impunity.When he has the power to condemn crimes, whoever practices crimes should be pursued subject sentence 10 times more the average citizen. New legal bases must be in place, because the Constitution did not provide for such villainys. It is sure that at the time of General DE GAULLE, such contempt of the people was unthinkable.It's time to make room for the VIe Republic