The Clearstream affair is the name of two cases concerning the Luxembourg clearing house Clearstream, since 2002, a division of DEUTSCHE BÖRSE. (Extracts from Wikipedia: Clearstream Affair)The Clearstream affair 1 (2001-2003)Consisted of a survey of Clearstream to verify the facts reported in 2001 - 2002 by journalist Denis ROBERT in his book Revelation$and The Black Box : the possible use of unpublished accounts system of the clearing house for money laundering. (Fraud and laundering hundreds of billions of FERRAYE royalties)The Clearstream affair 2 (2004-2011)Consisted of a manipulation of justice by a small group of politicians and industrialists, to involve in the Taiwan frigates scandal innocent persons in order to evict them. (The "innocent" persons in question were largely French Ministers and other senior officials of the French government with ties to the FERRAYE case and maybe not so "innocent" than that!CEDEL InternationalBefore taking the name of CLEARSTREAMin 2001 following the merger with DEUTSCHE BÖRSE, the company then 100% Luxembourger, was called CEDEL International and had a branch in Genevawith the Registration number CH 660.1.615.000-4. Of course, by saying that "discretion of measures", the Swiss federal authorities have removed some names from the register of the aforementioned trade, but the excerpt available HERE(not exhaustive), still allows to have an idea of the relationship between CEDEL International Geneva and other companies controlled by the French Government or banks involved.Until 2001, CEDEL International was chaired by the Swiss André Lussi dismissed and convicted for misuse of company property, forgery and use. A report by the Luxembourg bank supervisory authority had noted some "questionable" operations with a US IT services company. On April 27, 2006, the Luxembourg courts handed a nonsuit, but should we be surprised ? Before his activity by CEDEL, André Lussi had worked for UBS in London.André Lussi "the most powerful Swiss banker in the world"according to Article May 13, 2001 Swissinfo.ch / He was at the head of CLEARSTREAM, one of the most mysterious companies of international finance, established in Luxembourg. (quoting the article)Accusations of « Revelation$ » (From Wikipedia - Clearstream Case 1)The charge of Denis Robert and Ernest Backes based on four points :•Companies have accounts at Clearstream, and these accounts were used to make illegal money transfers. Cedel International customers then those of Clearstream may request that their accounts be published or not. According Clearstream, said accounts "unpublished" are audited and subject to the same controls as the said "published" accounts. At least one illegal transaction has been demonstrated, the BCCI after judicial closure. (Editor: BCCI was UBS partner).•Cedel International and Clearstream would hold non-financial corporate and individuals accounts. Many international groups are also financial groups, including a bank. According Clearstream customers are private or public banks, central banks or financial institutions and four companies.•According to Régis Hempel, a former computer scientist Clearstream Cedel-fired in 1992, data have been erased before the investigations of the Luxembourg court.•Ernest Backes also says in Revelation$he was responsible for the transfer of $ 7 million from Chase Manhattan Bank to the Citibank, on January 16, 1980, which helped to pay for the release of American hostages held in Tehran embassy. He gave a copy of the files at the National Assembly, and illuminating what Americans call the October Surprise.Ernest BACKES was a founder of CEDEL International and was the Nr 3 de CLEARSTREAM. On February 11, 2002, he asked Joseph FERRAYE to join him in Luxembourg to give him lists of CLEARSTREAM transcactions, indicating the origin of the funds and their final destination.The next day at the Hotel des Vignes in Luxembourg, in the interview with BACKES, he has revealed the involvement of the Trilateral Commission, the World Government, the Bilderberg group, all the secret societies which FERRAYE had never heard speak. BACKES again confirmed at the meeting, he would give him the promised documents, the next day at home.On February 13, 2002, in his own house, BACKES asked FERRAYE give these documents to Bernard BERTOSSA. Joseph FERRAYE who did not know that BACKES and BERTOSSA knew,had the bad reflex to point out to BACKES it was unwise to hand over documents in question to the Geneva prosecutor who was one of the main protagonists in the scam money .This remark upset BACKES who thought previously receiving benefifs paid by FERRAYE in compensation for his help. BACKES saw a better opportunity therefore choosing to go along with BERTOSSA instead FERRAYE. BACKES who wanted to get his share of the loot has used its relationship with BERTOSSA to get it and FERRAYE could not do anything to receive the promised documents.In March 2003, BACKESset an appointment to FERRAYÉ at the Geneva Airport and presented him André STREBEL. BACKES claimed that STREBEL would help FERRAYÉ to restore his rights. STREBEL set several successive appointments to FERRAYE in Nyon to obtain key information and parallel he intervened with its industrial relations (he was ssociate with BACKES in IWR - Institut für Wirtschaftsrecherchen GmbH in Saarbrücken D) to remove documents from governments and swiss banks.In fact, the role of STREBEL was to clean any traffic trace where FERRAYE funds had passed, as well as where compromising documents exist. To achieve this, he had to know what had FERRAYE as documents and information. It is then the STREBEL demand, that the German television ARD2 came record a program on FERRAYE in Geneva, which was broadcast in Germany.One of the first released document by STREBEL was the conclusive evidence of the involvement of the President of CREDIT SUISSE GROUP - Rainer E. GUT,whose signature appears on the Signature card of EVERTON Enterprises Ltd.in Road Town Tortola BVI.STREBEL could not understand that the President of CREDIT SUISSE Rainer E. GUT could combine in EVERTON Ltd, with criminals who normally dealt with SBS (ex UBS) ... It's finally Francis Mayoraz in Geneva, who saw FERRAYE, the signature card which included the Chairman of CREDIT SUISSE Rainer E. GUT. He then also obtained Form Awith the appropriate signatures at Credit Suisse.STREBEL has confirmed to FERRAYE he was right concerning the signing of Rainer E. GUT, and that he too, has obtained the aforesaid document, but refused to forward.On October 17, 2003, STREBEL has convened FERRAYE in St-Prex VD and showed him 15 centimeters of documents which he had removed the headers and signatures. He asked FERRAYE to read. Joseph FERRAYE refused, retorting to his interlocutor that he would not be interested by documents without identity, that anyone could make and he was willing to come back the day STREBEL would submit him not tampered documents.During this interview, STREBEL asked FERRAYE to note the name of the lawyer MEMBREZ in Geneva.STREBEL was going to get an appointment with BONNANT and WARLUZELin the days that followed and FERRAYE was going to cash 1 to 2 billion dollars. STREBEL said, "you will not refuse them. You accept them. We take them and we réattaque".Sunday, October 26, 2003, STREBEL informed FERRAYE that he had an appointment with BONNANT and BERTOSSA to 14.00 H. He set an appointment to FERRAYE at the McDonald in Nyon at 16.00 H. STREBEL only arrived at 18.30 and confirmed to FERRAYE he would receive $ 100 million. FERRAYE replied that he agreed and "We take them and we réattaque !This response, which yet accurately reflect the STREBEL formulation of 17 October 2003, has made him this day completely berserk. He stood up screaming "it's not going in your head ? what would you do with more than 100 million ? With this money you can live, you, your children and grandchildren, like royalty. You will receive $ 100 million net for you, that's a lot of money that you can not spend etc. ".On October 27, 2003, during his phone call, STREBEL notified FERRAYE "if you do not do what I tell you, I'll kick your ass." Subsequently, during its contacts with STREBEL, FERRAYE did nothing but be insulted !Yet we see on a draft letter written by STREBELand faxed from his office (IWR - Institut für Wirtschaftsrecherchen GmbH), to FERRAYE on 10.10.2003, that he attacked the magistrate JUNOD. We must then so deduce, on the basis of the points above, that he only wanted to put pressure to get integrated into the plot and receive his part.On December 12, 2003, the date of the hearing of POSSA - BONVIN and BRUPPACHER by judge JUNOD, STREBEL has called FERRAYE who was absent and he left the message to her daughter to remind as soon as possible, it was very important.In May 2002, Me LUDOT French lawyer, told FERRAYE he had obtained a copy of the Aix-en-Provence procedure about Paul Marc COLNE, who had signed the backdated agreement with ARAMCO (tab History / scammed patents). COLNE were murdered in December 1997...On December 13, 2003, FERRAYE recalled STREBEL who announced to him : "You do not know what I have done for you yesterday ? I met for 4 to 5 hours, Paul Marc COLNE [...]"... FERRAYE retorted that Paul Marc COLNE was assassinated in December 1997, but STREBEL insisted, claiming that it was wrong, he was with him the day before. According STREBEL, FERRAYE was wrong. STREBEL then hung up by mentioning that he would call back the next day.On December 14, 2003, STREBEL recalled FERRAYE and confirmed that he was right, Paul Marc COLNE was dead in 1997 ... but STREBEL said he was awaiting a decision of the Court of Perpignan... that he would transmit this act to Juge Christine JUNOD in Geneva and that this decision would enable to restore all its rights to FERRAYE. These successive telephone conversations were recordedIn fact, STREBEL had misunderstood his accomplices (BERTOSSA - BONNANT) who rode a new plan. Instead of mentioning his meeting with Paul Marc COLNE, STREBEL should have said that he was waiting the decision of Tribunal of PERPIGNAN, that would confirm posthumous the condemnation of COLNE, who had signed the backdated agreement. The STREBEL confusion, who said he spoke for 4 to 5 hours with Paul Marc COLNE, corresponded in fact, at the time where POSSA - BONVIN and BRUPPACHER hearings with STREBEL, who was attending to establish his false custom declarations...The coincidence of the STREBEL call of 12 December 2003, the day of the hearing of the three protagonists, can not be a coincidence, since these statements ignore any involvement of living accomplices, but with the decision of PERPIGNAN, STREBEL believed postpone charges on Paul Marc COLNE who is dead and can not protest ...These facts imply once again the Geneva magistrate Christine JUNOD who made protocol of hearing dictated by STREBEL, according to the BERTOSSA plan. This also complements the heads of accusations against the three auditioned for false testimony. Remember that August 26, 2002, Judge JUNOD had confirmed to be in possession of bank documents in the amount of USD 24.0 billion, pieces she had received from Daniel LEVAVALLEUR.